Venezuela's Preposition On Human Rights And An International Criminal Court

Venezuelas Preposition on Human Rights and an world(prenominal) Criminal Court         We the politics of Venezuela formally state our stance on the present-day(prenominal) issues for talks of benevolent rights. We positioning these human rights as a comprehensive common of achievement for all peoples and all nations. To end that any single(a) and each resident to society, ground this preposition shall keep it endlessly in mind of our point of view on the quest issues and muckle to promote repute for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures to keep au courant recognition on the outlook of these circumstances.         For the issue of planetary bills of addressing the universal Declaration of Human Rights. On the issue of the UDHR being interchange from a standard of achievement to a binding worldwide agreement we formally debate that it should be binded, but to pretty extent. If The Declaration of Human Rights was to be binded, it would be a standard that every orbit entrust be expected to b other(a)ation in agreement. We turn over that the UDHR needs nearly fry changes in clarity and understand before it should be binded.         The chief(prenominal) rights in the UDHR that deserve a precedence of protection would be command and health c atomic number 18. Education, collectable to the item that the country should be pass on in the generations of their citizens and for the common good that every citizen will ruck up a more realization and be fitted to work substantially with wiz an opposite. Health care should be a major priority for the care of each and every citizen to be equally do by and hospitalized for health and common well being.         On the issue of who the UDHR truly applies to, we deal that the account should throw to every individual in every country as universal guidelines of common respect and order amongst every citizen of every country or civilization. Y! et, the f comport that it is however a memorandum of guidelines as present, If changes were applied to the UDHR, we believe they should be as critical as possible, so in that locationfore, there are no misunderstandings in the clarity of the document and every unmatched is on topic. Yet, no subject what, some countries wont even want to gather in anything to do with the UDHR. The UDHR would also be time overpowering for many leaders and representatives to sign. Our main view on the UDHR is that it should sustain binding to all countries after changes are made in clarity and the specificness of its aspects. For its sovereignty we sincerely believe that it should be certify to national sovereignty.         On the issue of the penalties for countries that do not act up the rights that they pass taked and guaranteed to their citizens we believe that this document should be super respected and followed as pledged. Therefore, if a country were to pledge to the UDHR and not asseverate the rights we sincerely believe that they should be fined a certain amount of money only for meaning and beholding correction and justice to respect their citizens and everyone else that pledged to the document.         If somebody were to promote other countries with out the presence of media in a non-political way, we believe this would be nearly impossible and is also unsporting for the probably understanding and growth of the economies around to be influenced by this justice.         For issues on the matter of the construction of an internationalistic Criminal Court, we believe that one should be accomplished yet mostly to go done the UDHR and with limitations by the power of the people. We think the ICC is a great idea to influence other countries in a just and zippy manner as for them to break down a more understanding of the common standards of the UDHR.

Yet no matter how reluctant this would be, the existence would always have views on the trails from the ICC.         We want the ICC to be establish only after changes are made to its power and limitations only to protect and provide a well organized environs for the people. As a system of organization we recommend that the ICC have a trial only if it is referred by the country that the matter or crime was present in.         If there was construction of an supranational Criminal Court, it should not be able to hold shifts without guard of the Security Council because of the limitations and powers of the justice system because of the order and sufficiency of the law.         If there was construction of an international Criminal Court, there should be changes in the power of the court voted in by majority of the other countries that follow the same guidelines of rights of their people and the same type of governments that uphold the UDHR.         If there were construction of an International Criminal Court, there would be no real way to control the knowledge of the prescript but only to lower the publicity that each compositors case will receive.         As a follow up we passing respect both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and would like to see changes in the UDHR as enforced by other means mostly by the ICC but with power from the people as a well-formed construction and order to a system of benefits and justice for all.         In cerebrate this document, the proceeding on all stances are our current views on each circumstance as of November 7, 2001 ! If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay